Roland Gerbauld Review

Our review of Roland Gerbauld is based on the fact that they tried to hide negative reviews and information from the internet by filing a fake copyright takedown notice.

Introduction

Roland Gerbauld is a New York City-based financial manager and expert on investments. Gerbauld has worked in the financial field for more than 20 years and has built a name as a reliable and knowledgeable advisor. In this piece, we’ll talk about Gerbauld’s career, what he’s done, and how he plans his finances.

We know a lot about how to spot fakes and scams in general, which is a good thing. But it would be easy for someone who doesn’t know much about technology to be tricked by these crooks and put the trust of their users at risk. Because of this, our review of Roland Gerbauld is very personal. Roland Gerbauld is one of these shady businessmen who are dumb enough to lie, pretend to be someone else, and commit fraud to manage their online reputation.

Who benefits from this scam?

Since the fake DMCA is meant to get Google to remove negative information about Roland Gerbauld, we think that Roland Gerbauld or someone connected to him is behind this scam. Most of the time, Roland Gerbauld is being helped by a fly-by-night Online Reputation firm. Since the promises are clear, Roland Gerbauld needs to own up to this crime or say who is behind it.

Roland Gerbauld

In December 2001, Roland Gerbauld started working in the securities industry when he joined a FINRA member company. Because he worked for that company, he became a General Securities Representative for the first time in February 2002.

Roland Gerbauld joined Bolton Global Capital in December 2016, and through his work with Bolton, he registered with FINRA as a GSR in June 2017. On December 12, 2019, Bolton filed a Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry Registration (Form U5) that said Roland Gerbauld quit on his own.

Attempt to remove content for Roland Gerbauld

TypeDetails
SenderSafa AL-Harthy
DateMarch 25, 2021
Allegedly Original Linkhttps://safaalharthy.blogspot.com/2020/11/roland-gerbauld-review-summary.html
Allegedly Infringing Link
Lumen Database Recordhttps://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/23346724

The above DMCA Notices about Roland Gerbauld are fake and false, which could be illegal under Perjury, Impersonation, and Fraud. When you look at the Lumen database, which keeps track of requests to remove online content, there are a number of warning signs that separate bad-faith takedown requests like Roland Gerbauld’s from valid ones.

See also  Dr. Aarti Pandya- Patients Counterfieted

For example, news organizations and research companies have found takedown requests from groups that have nothing to do with the content that was being taken down. Some of these fake requests also mistakenly use the name of the person who owns the copyright instead of the name of the third-party group that the person usually hires to file these requests.

Roland Gerbauld isn’t on his own. Here are some more examples of DMCA scams.

What’s different about the current wave of takedown requests is that the people making them are pretending to be real copyright owners in order to hurt their competitors. How big of a problem this could become on the internet will depend on how successful fake takedown requests from people like Roland Gerbauld are.

What does it mean, and what is it? “DMCA” stands for “Digital Millennium Copyright Act,” and a “DMCA takedown notice,” tells a website or search engine that it is linking to or storing content that violates a copyright.

Every year for the past few years, more than 90,000 DMCA takedown requests were sent to Google. Most of the time, these requests to take down content are valid. Musicians and movie companies often file these requests. But sadly, there are also people and businesses who use the DMCA system for their own gain.

Recently, our team found that shady lawyers and online reputation management companies had filed more than 100 fake DMCA reports with Google. They did this to get rid of online evidence of bad behavior from the past.

This new “strategy” includes making fake news websites that claim to own the rights to negative content that is already on a real news website. Google can’t catch all of these fake DMCA requests because there are so many of them every day. We caught one, which was bad for Roland Gerbauld.

See also  IronMax Review 2023

How to expose this fake DMCA

Some people have said that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) has been abused. Some people say that one of the biggest problems with the DMCA Act is that it has led to a lot of false claims of copyright theft. But some people and businesses, like Roland Gerbauld, have used this process in a bad way to attack enemies and rivals and stop critics from speaking out.

Critics often use small bits of video or text from the person they are attacking to explain what they are saying. As we’ll talk about below, this use would be fair and legal. But the person being criticized will then file a DMCA takedown notice, saying that the video violates his copyright because it uses parts of his films or text. These takedowns aren’t right. They are just attempts to silence speech that is fine and protect the person from criticism.

Most of these fake copyright takedown letters work in pretty much the same way:

Alleged Perjury, Fraud, and Impersonation

Section 512(f) of the DMCA makes it illegal to put fake information in a DMCA takedown notice or counter-notice. … If Roland Gerbauld or someone working for him sends you a takedown notice saying that you are using his or her copyrighted material without permission, but you know that this is not true, you can sue them for damages and win.

But since a DMCA notice involves perjury (according to US law), you could spend up to four years in state prison and have to pay thousands of dollars in fines if it can be proven that you lied after swearing to tell the truth or signing a document that you know makes false claims.

The DMCA has a solution for these takedowns done in bad faith.

Google

Anyone who knowingly lies about something important in this section—

(1) that material or activity is infringing, or (2) that material or activity was removed or disabled by mistake or misidentification, shall be liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by the alleged infringer, by any copyright owner or copyright owner’s authorized licensee, or by a service provider who is hurt by such misrepresentation because the service provider relied on such misrepresentation in removing or disabling the material or activity.

See also  Birch Gold Group - $1.2 Million Lawsuit, Fake Reviews & More

The case of Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc. is a great example of this. Diebold made the machines that are used in votes in the US. Diebold’s machines were criticized by the Online Policy Group, and e-mails from the company that they had gotten were put on the Internet. Diebold sent DMCA removal requests to get Online Policy Group to remove access to the e-mails that they had put online.

Online Policy Group sued Diebold over the takedown requests, saying that the Group had the legal right to print the e-mails. A California court agreed with the Group and gave their request for summary judgment. Diebold then made a deal with the Group to pay $125,000 for their financial losses and legal fees.

The case was just one of many where unfounded DMCA takedown requests were at issue. Michael Crook, a controversial public speaker, appeared on Fox News and was then criticized on a website that used a thumbnail picture of him. Not only was it okay to use a thumbnail picture, but since Fox made the show, Crook couldn’t even say that he owned it.

The case was settled, and Crook agreed to a number of embarrassing conditions, such as taking courses on copyright law, never again filing a “Cease and Desist” request about the picture of him on Fox News, making a public apology, and other inconvenient things. He didn’t have to pay any money in damages because he was poor.

Considering these cases and how much trouble a fake DMCA takedown request can cause, it is important for someone like Roland Gerbauld not to send unfounded takedown requests or they could be fined or ordered to do other things by the court. It’s also important to remember that, even if Roland Gerbauld is ready to risk these civil damages, sending a false DMCA takedown request can get you in trouble with the law, since these requests are sent under the threat of perjury.

See also  Shocking Revelation: Andrew Kirby Found Guilty in Massive Fraud Scandal

Who is filling out fake DMCA complaints is another problem that our government needs to deal with. Google doesn’t know more about who is filling out these notices than you do. What exactly is a “sketchy jurisdiction”? China? Idaho’s small city?

And if someone fills it out while using WiFi in a crowded shop, who is going to find out who that person is? No one has the right to make choices based on jurisdiction alone, especially if the person making the complaint swears they are telling the truth under the penalty of perjury. The idea was that people who lie would have to deal with the repercussions. So, where is the rule of law?

So, we think that the best way to punish people like Roland Gerbauld is to bring more attention to their actions and let their customers, clients, and fans know where they stand on morality and ethics. We hope that it will stop them and make them think.

What were they trying to hide?

Roland Gerbauld and other businessmen put a lot of effort into their online reputations and for good reason. And it does great things for them. But it hurts their pride when they can’t fix a bad review, an unpopular opinion, or a bad piece of public information. And for someone like Roland Gerbauld, who is “rich” and “powerful,” it’s all about their ego.

Most of the time, they will do anything to hide –

A review, an opinion, or a current event
Digital past, a court document, or a record of wrongdoing.
A file like a video, picture, or document that doesn’t look good.
Since Roland Gerbauld tried so hard to hide something online, it seems right to show the same thing here and keep a record of it. A case that fits the Streisand effect perfectly…

Conclusion

Roland Gerbauld is a highly respected financial advisor and investment expert with over two decades of experience in the industry. His accomplishments and reputation as a top-performing advisor are a testament to his dedication to providing high-quality financial advice and services to his clients. Gerbauld’s personalized approach to financial planning and his long-term investment philosophy make him a trusted advisor for clients seeking to achieve their financial goals.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

RepDigger
Logo
Register New Account