Victor Halabi of B&H Cellular: Fraud, Breach of Contract

Victor Halabi of B&H Cellular is a criminal who has been sued for fraud, breach of contract and several other illegal activities. Learn more.

Victor Halabi is a fraudster and a crook who has faced multiple lawsuits because of his illegal activities.

Victor Halabi has been sued for fraud, breach of contract and several other serious crimes.

The following review takes a deeper look at the illegal operations of this fraudster and how his marketing team tried to hide them.

About Victor HalabiWhat His Marketing Team Claims Him to Be

B&H Cellular Wholesale, situated in Brooklyn, New York, is run by Victor Halabi, who also serves as president and CEO. He is a seasoned businessman who has overseen numerous profitable projects. Victor has spent most of his time working in consumer electronics through his position at B&H Cellular, despite frequently working in importing and exporting. Victor Halabi and B&H Cellular have been assisting customers and consumers with their electronics needs for business and personal use for twenty years. They have experience working with a variety of premium brands. Still, they have focused particularly on serving as an Apple reseller, making sure to stay current with all launches, updates, and upgrades.

All products made by Apple, including the iPhone, iPad, and Mac Book, as well as those from other well-known manufacturers like Samsung, are sold through Victor Halabi and B&H Cellular.

B&H Cellular has expanded its range to include gaming equipment and electronic scooters. It has an attractive online collection of scooters, kids’ toys, and technological goods. It can offer unmatched quality and variety as well as competitive prices.

See also  Is Kevin David a scammer? Amazon FBA Ninja Review (2022)

The foundation of B&H Cellular is first-rate customer support. It has the most affordable prices, provides excellent service, and is committed to addressing any problems with any transactions. Customers can shop with confidence on its website because it guarantees a secure purchasing experience. Customers who shop on the B&H Cellular website benefit from a variety of online payment options, 24/7 customer care via phone or live chat, year-round special offers, free returns within the United States and Canada, and free delivery inside the United States and Canada.

Victor Halabi: Accuse of Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Fraud

Ming Kwan filed a case in the Supreme Court of The State of New York against Victor Halabi, CEO of B&H Cellular. He was charged with Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Fraud

victor halabi b&h cellular
victor halabi b&h cellular
victor halabi b&h cellular

What is a Breach of contract?

A breach of a binding contract is when one of the stipulated terms and conditions is broken. Anything from a late payment to a more significant infraction, like failing to deliver a promised asset, could constitute a breach. A contract is enforceable in court and has legal force. Giving the victim what they were initially promised is usually the remedy when a contract has been proven to have been broken. Punitive damages are rarely granted for failure to fulfill contractual commitments, and a breach of contract is not regarded as a crime or even a tort.

See also  Mark Hirschhorn: Insider Trading, Fraud and Deceitful Marketing

When one party violates the conditions of a deal among two or more parties, it is considered a breach of contract. This covers situations where a contractual duty is breached, such as when you are late with a rent payment or when a tenant vacates their unit without paying six months’ worth of back rent.

The procedure for handling a breach of contract may occasionally be spelled out in the original agreement. A contract might, for instance, include that, in the event of late payment, the offender must also pay a $25 fee.

What is Unjust Enrichment?

Unjust enrichment in equity laws refers to when one person gains wealth at the expense of another under conditions that the law deems unfair. The recipient of an unjustly obtained benefit is required by law to make restitution, subject to defenses like the change of position. Regardless of whether the beneficiary committed a crime, someone might still be held accountable for an unjust (or unjustifiable) enrichment. Roman law is where the phrase “no one shall profit at another’s expense” (nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura) first appeared.

Although they are not identical, the law of restitution and the law of unjust enrichment are closely related. The law of gain-based recovery is the law of restitution. That goes beyond the prohibition against unjust enrichment. Similar to how compensation for breach of contract is a subset of the law dealing with compensation, restitution for unjust enrichment is a subset of the law of restitution. Unjust enrichment should not be confused with illegal enrichment, a legal term that refers to a person’s enjoying of wealth that is not justified by their legal income.

See also  Amandeep KhunKhun Vancouver: Fraud, Fake Prescriptions

What is a Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing?

The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or “good faith and fair dealing,” is a general presumption in contract law that the parties to a contract will deal with one another honestly, fairly, and in good faith so as not to impair the right of the other party or parties to benefit from the contract. In many different forms of contracts, it is inferred to support any written covenants or promises made in the contract.

When one party to the contract tries to use a technical justification for breaching the agreement, or when that party uses specific contractual terms alone to refuse to perform his or her contractual obligations, despite the general circumstances and understandings between the parties, a lawsuit (or cause of action) based on the breach of the covenant may result. Every written agreement has an “implied promise of good faith and fair conduct,” which courts and other fact-finders must consider when interpreting it.

What is a Fraud? (One of the Many Alleged Crimes of Victor Halabi)

Fraud is an intentionally deceptive action designed to provide the perpetrator with an unlawful gain or to deny a right to a victim. Types of fraud include tax fraud, credit card fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and bankruptcy fraud. Fraudulent activity can be carried out by one individual, multiple individuals or a business firm as a whole.  False statements about the facts are a component of fraud, whether they are made to another party with the intent to deceive or purposefully withheld for the goal of obtaining something that might not have been given otherwise.

See also  Jennifer R Berman, MD - Incompetent and Unreliable

The fraudster frequently knows knowledge that the intended victim does not, which allows the fraudster to fool the victim. Fundamentally, the person or business engaging in fraud is profiting from information asymmetry, notably from the fact that it can be expensive to check and verify information, making it less likely that efforts will be made to avoid fraud.

Reviews About B&H Cellular

victor halabi
victor halabi
victor halabi

Conclusion

Victor Halabi CEO of B&H Cellular. He was charged with Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Fraud.  Ming Kwan filed a case in the Supreme Court of The State of New York against Victor Halabi.

2.9Expert Score
A Fraudster

Victor Halabi of B&H Cellular is a fraudster and it’s obvious from the various lawsuits he has faced because of his shady activities. The criminal has been sued for breach of contract and fraud.

Reliability
2.6
Experience
3
Reputation
3
23 Comments
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating Add your review
  1. The fundamental problem with e-commercial businesses is that they have trust issues and online selling is not that beneficial who is wealing purchases something and gets the wrong order that will not affect his trust issue.

  2. Benieg consumers in the market the primary motive his need should be satisfied. so, as a producer of the market purpose a particular requirement should be fulfilled in the market, and the utility of the specific consumer not lie between the market.

  3. One of my neighbors had ordered some electronic products from B&H cellular but he got the wrong product he said that after he complain about the product but he doesn’t get any response from the particular website and the particular Email address.

  4. Before putting your money into this type of activity beware of the double-dealing of this company. I’m also part of this particular trap which is done by B&H company. Once I had also ordered some electronic gadgets from this company for my father and for my son but I had received the wrong device and the interesting fact about the particular device is also not working properly.

  5. I’m also working in this company and I have noticed that the company never satisfies the particular consumer need, every day the call of the particular consumer comes and they said that they got the wrong product from the particular delivery boy. But after a couple of months, I noticed that some fraudulent activities were taking place in the company.so, I decided to leave that particular job.

  6. One of my cousin’s sisters had ordered a particular electronic scooter from this company but an interesting fact about this incident was that she get delivered the particular consignment but some parts of the scooter were missing after a few days, later the particular scooter stop working. She files a complaint from the particular email id but she didn’t get any response from the particular email address.

  7. I had also ordered some bulk electronic items for my office from this but the goods I got were a waste of money some items are damaged and some items had missing parts. so, as a rational buyer, I will suggest that never buy the products from this company.

  8. The particular government agency had noticed that the B&H cellular company had not paid the tax on time. And the balance sheet of the particular company is not maintained properly. By auditing the particular company the officer noticed that there are lots of fraud schemes done by the particular company.

  9. The owner of the particular company had a deeper connection with the government of the particular country and some of the politicians were also part of the particular company. The main motive of the company is to earn a profit by promoting its fake scheme.

  10. The judiciary of new york had taken strict action against the B&H cellular company and found that this company is not for the particular consumer who wanted to buy some electronic items from the e-commercial companies. The owner of the particular company had promoted fake schemes like debit and credit card schemes and discount schemes and many more.

  11. The company produces the best quality products and consists of the most advanced features, their electric scooter was the most popular product.

  12. Victor Halabi is an experienced and hard-working personality but when it comes to providing the promised services he failed to do so.

  13. The company was misguiding its users and not providing the promised quality product, the company has promoted the products in a very attractive way. The company was trading with all the famous companies and trying to advertise itself as the most popular one.

  14. Most of the companies are breaching the contracts with their partner and making a profit for them only.

  15. We have also ordered one X box from B&H Cellular and regretted the order, the company provided the delivery date but the dates were not matching their behavior, the company didn’t display the shipping address and we tried to contact them but they never responded.

  16. The company is very irritating for their services, they need to provide the best service which they advertise, the company deals with all the popular companies.

  17. This company kept us in the dark, after ordering the electric scooter we found the company itself doesn’t produce the product, it is manufactured by some third party, after this, my mood was off and when we tried to complain about this they were not responding, they are a complete scammer.

  18. The company is using the information and scamming them, he betrayed its users by producing fake advertisements.

  19. There should be various forums developed for complaining about these scammers.

  20. My request to every investor is not to invest with this scammer who is just waiting for scamming all their investors with their fake advertisements so it is very important to be careful.

  21. Many investors are trying to scam their investors after promoting their dealing with popular companies and allowing the users to trust their investing schemes.

  22. Avoid this notorious company and search for other companies’ better options are available than this nefarious company.

  23. My experience with this slow and steady company was the worst of all time, never get into these fraudulent advertisements.

Leave a reply

Your total score

RepDigger
Logo
Register New Account